Gender Rules of Today

1. Women want full independence but Women want male protection when things get rough or dangerous
2. Men and women can vote but The draft and compulsory military service are male only
3. Men are expected to work in jobs that they do not care for to support their families but Men are lazy for not doing half of the housework
4. When boys perform badly in school there is a “crisis in masculinity” but When girls perform badly they are being discriminated against
5. Women “get rid of jerks” but Men “cannot commit”
6. Male circumcision is a proud tradition but Female circumcision is abhorred, even the kinds that are milder than male circumcision
7. Commenting on a woman’s cleavage is sexual harassment but A woman who purposely flaunts her cleavage at work is not sexually harassing anyone
8. All good men pay for the date but All good men support gender neutral pay
9. Men’s financial power must be controlled but Women’s sexual power must be liberated
10. Fathers should take care of their children but children aren’t DNA tested to establish paternity
11. Men prey on women but Women exercise their sexual freedom
12. The overarching inconsistency: Men are responsible for their actions and failures — Women are victims of circumstances or societal structures

Stop the Monologues Project

CHICAGO, IL – Americans For Truth today launched its “Stop the Monologues Project,” to expose Eve Ensler’s radical feminist play, “The Vagina Monologues” (TVM) — which includes a chapter in which Ensler, a reported bisexual, asks a six-year-old girl several questions about the girl’s vagina.

A host of celebrities, including Oprah Winfrey and Faith Hill, are joining Ensler in celebrating the tenth anniversary of her play this weekend in New Orleans.

On pages 103-104 of the 10th-anniversary edition of The Vagina Monologues, in a chapter titled, “I Asked a Six-Year-Old Girl,” Ensler asks the following questions based on an interview with an unnamed girl (only the answer to the last question is provided below):

• If your vagina got dressed, what would it wear?”
• If it could speak, what would it say?”
• What does your vagina remind you of?”
• What’s special about your vagina?”
• What does your vagina smell like?”
• [answer:] “Snowflakes.”

Peter LaBarbera, president of Americans for Truth and father of five children, said it is astonishing that Ensler and her vulgar play are being celebrated given TVM’s past and current promotion of adult predatory behavior against minors:

“Imagine if an adult homosexual man were to quiz a six-year-old boy about his penis — or a straight man were to ask a little girl silly questions about her private parts – for use in a play! Would such men be praised by the media and famous personalities?”

Stop the Monologues Project Director Donna Miller, the mother of a teenage girl, said,

“I find it horrifying that an author would sexualize a six-year-old girl –– particularly when that same author has a record of writing favorably about adult/child sex, at least for lesbians.”

Miller noted the hypocrisy of a movement whose stated goal is to “stop the violence against women and girls,” while it celebrates a lesbian rape-seduction, underage drinking, and a bisexual adult asking highly inappropriate sexual questions to a six-year-old.

The Vagina Monologues book, on pages 80-82, tells of a lesbian rape-seduction in a story titled, “The Little Coochi Snorcher That Could.” In the monologue, a 24-year-old woman plies a 16-year-old girl with alcohol before seducing her (statutory rape in many states).

The original ‘Monologues’ play included the same segment except the victimized girl was just 13.

Americans For Truth
www.americansfortruth.org
April 12, 2008

Threesome Marriage

See article

Excerpt:

First came traditional marriage. Then, gay marriage. Now, there's a movement combining both—simultaneously. Abby Ellin visits the next frontier of nuptials: the "triad."

Less than 18 months ago, Sasha Lessin and Janet Kira Lessin gathered before their friends near their home in Maui, and proclaimed their love for one another. Nothing unusual about that—Sasha, 68, and Janet, 55—were legally married in 2000. Rather, this public commitment ceremony was designed to also bind them to Shivaya, their new 60-something "husband." Says Sasha: “I want to walk down the street hand in hand in hand in hand and live together openly and proclaim our relationship. But also to have all those survivor and visitation rights and tax breaks and everything like that.”

Slutty Feminism

Unlike most of my female college classmates, I was never a fan of the show "Sex and the City." My roommates would rent the videos and buy cheap champagne and watch them.

I watched the show with them one night. After barely stomaching two episodes, I declared the show would be better titled "Sluts and the City," then went to bed.

I wish other students had followed my lead. Instead, they chose to usher in a new wave of feminism: Slut feminism, where the new test of gender equality is how openly promiscuous a woman can be without judgment or penalty. Wouldn't the suffragettes be proud to see how far we have come?

Across the nation, other female students were falling in love with the "slut feminism" Carrie Bradshaw and her sex-obsessed cronies in "Sex and the City" epitomized. Student newspapers started running sex columns, featuring college women publicizing their sexual exploits just as the Carrie character publicized hers. USA Today reported, "From 'Between the Sheets' at Tufts University near Boston to 'Sex at the Beach' at California State University in Long Beach... college students talk about, dispensing tips and offering advice on sex, dating, sex, love, sex, relationships, sex and sex."

After some research, I found the topics a little more limited. Mostly written by women, the recurring themes seem to be the female anatomy, female orgasms, masturbation and oral sex, which, thanks to Bill Clinton, isn't considered sex, according to most of these students.

From Cornell University's "Cornellingus," to Princeton's "Vulvagraphy" and Yale's "Sex and the Elm City," it seems the Ivy League isn't immune to this trend. The so-called "best and the brightest" are becoming the best and the brightest of the porn industry. How proud their parents will be when they start their careers writing for Playboy.

You can't even judge them. In their world of moral relativism, no one has the right to judge others. In Columbia University's sex column, "Sexplorations," Miriam Datskosky explains why the all-too-common "walk of shame" shouldn't be shameful at all. She argues that, men and women should be able to go out and have sex whenever and with whoever they like, and when walking home the next morning -- wearing the same clothes from the night before, their make-up smeared and their hair a mess -- they shouldn't be judged: "It is not up to a random stranger to make you feel ashamed." Moral relativism and the sexual revolution had a baby, and boy is it ugly.

She says: "Every single one of us has the right to choose. That right deserves respect." Respecting someone's right to choose to be promiscuous and respecting their actual choice to do so are two different things. I'm not advocating outlawing promiscuity, but I do support holding people morally responsible for their choices.

There's not much parents can do. Most student newspapers are independently run. And, any attempt to have these columns removed would certainly stir accusations of censorship by students so indoctrinated they don't understand obscenity is not protected by the Constitution.

Students, on the other hand, have some options. With the help of organizations like the Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute, they can bring conservative women leaders, such as Michelle Malkin, Ann Coulter or Phyllis Schlafly, to their schools to challenge this type of thinking.

For now, unfortunately, it seems women lead slut feminism, considering they are the only authors of these columns.

But this shouldn't come as a surprise when you have a play like "The Vagina Monologues" performed on almost 600 college campuses. The play's main message is that women are nothing more than their sexual anatomy. Many of their parents, having come of age in the 1960s, might be thrilled with what the seeds of their "sexual revolution" have finally developed.

Sexual freedom has turned into sexual obsession. Perversion and promiscuity are applauded, morality and chastity condemned. Female college students of the slut feminism camp are finally equal to the men. It's a shame, though, that they view equality as an equal number of notches on their belts.

MONIQUE E. STUART

A program officer at the Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute in Herndon, Va

University right to cancel Women Studies

Article here. Excerpt:

'Rather than home economics, in the minds of most people I know women's studies means militant, obnoxious feminism that is filled with man-hate and rubbish/rot academic courses preached to the closed ranks of a male-bashing all-female choir.

Unfortunately, what started as a good idea with noble aims was politicized by radical elements to become a female version of a good-old-boys club.
...
In short, women's studies programs in most U.S. and Canadian colleges and universities have become radicalized, exclusionary, impractical, and dangerously self-isolated. That is a recipe for demise. Women's studies does NOT allow us to evaluate the world through women's experience because it does not reflect the attitudes, beliefs and lives of a great majority of women in this world.'

He's Dead, She Walks - DV's Double Standard‏

Action alert here.

Excerpt:

'This past week in Canada a young man, Adam Cunningham, lost his life as a result of domestic violence apparently perpetrated by his wife. At the time of the initial incident she was charged with assault. Now that Adam is dead the Crown prosecutor declines to charge her further with manslaughter or homicide, and has told the family the assualt charges may be dropped as well, since the victim - who was also the only witness - has died.

Note in the obituary the comment that the wife will miss him. We can only imagine what that might mean.'

Being Gay is a sexual disorder

There is no finer metaphor for “pretzel logic” than the issue of “gay rights”. The contemporary addiction to “gay” liberation is no less dangerous or mind-altering than being addicted to heroin.

Being gay is a sexual disorder the American Psychological Association does not recognize because it drove out Division leaders and members who recognized sexual addiction for what it is. Gay men have eight times more sexual partners than heterosexual men do, and are the prevalent reason why 3% of individuals living in Washington D.C. are infected with H.I.V – on par with AIDS crisis countries such as Kenya — and three times the threshold for declaration of an epidemic (and emergency containment policy) by the C.D.C.

In spite of the fact there is very little empirical research to see if homosexuality might be a sexual disorder, and despite convincing sexual behavior statistical community evidence that homosexuality is probably a sexual disorder (and definitely a significant public health risk), the APA pretends it is not a disorder. Welcome back to the Dark Ages of societal decline caused by politically-correct Frankfurt school knowledge censors.

Speaking frankly, I know what goes on in the gay community having been invited to a few gay parties. The real party is in the bathroom. The parade goes both ways all night with any number of people in there at one time. It’s a crack house for sex addicts.

I once got a contract doing a large stage show in Reno, Nevada because the existing show had to close. Its cast consisted of gay men, who gave each other AIDS and were too sick to work.

I know another young man in his late 20’s who was preened into the gay lifestyle by activists in high school. Many high school boys don’t know what to do with girls, and find the safety of the “gay equivalent of the Boy Scouts” an attractive proposition. He is now dying of AIDS – unable to afford treatment — and about to file for bankruptcy due to past-due medical expenses.

We know that crack, heroine, and other mood-altering addictive substances are dangerous to individuals and inflict great costs and health risks on larger society. We do not think twice about dealing with drug and alcohol addiction at face value. That is why “crack studies” and “smoker’s rights” are not taught in schools. Accordingly, drugs are illegal. We tax the daylights out of tobacco, and some cities have even made smoking illegal in many locations.

If “drug rights” promoters filed lawsuits asking the courts to mandate the establishment of “Friends of Drug Lovers” support groups in the public schools, they would be laughed out of town.

No matter how one cuts it, schools and universities promoting queerness as an attractive lifestyle may one day find themselves being sued by those who become ill after being conscripted into this dangerous lifestyle.

The shrill defiance of same-sex rights activists has gone too far. Same-sex marriage is now out of the question. As an “economic right” advocates now demand, same-sex marriage would not build chastity into open marriages.

Same-sex marriage is a viciously sexist proposition: the stated intent of feminist strategists is to secure the right for any two women to marry each other, turning marriage into a feminist political institution having chattel control of family, children, and the levers of political power. We are not far from this day. Upon creation of Obama’s White House Council on Women and Girls, N.O.W’s president (and Alpha-lesbian) Kim Gandy proudly proclaimed “We Got the Entire Cabinet”. Obama is set to inject gay lifestyle into the military, and sign a non-binding U.N. gay rights treaty that G.W. Bush refused to sign. N.O.W. does not give a damn about gay men – many of whom will die supporting N.O.W.’s feminist-supremacist agenda.

The men’s movement is presently bifurcated on gay rights. Very strong disagreement exists behind the scenes among leaders of the men’s movement.

Most colleges and universities actively sponsor “Men’s Rights” as a subset of women’s studies programs – limited to gay rights activism. A good chunk of the larger men’s rights movement has been thus compromised – men’s rights activists are often brainwashed pro-gay college graduates or have been browbeaten along with the rest of the quaking masses into believing that opposing this aspect of the feminist agenda is somehow bigoted.

This problem is dividing and conquering this movement right at the starting gate. There is a strange belief held by left-leaning men’s rights activists, who believe that supporting this aspect of the feminist agenda will somehow translate into Democrat support for other men’s rights agenda such as VAWA and parental rights reforms. This is rather like asking Hitler to make full citizens of Jews who supported the Third Reich.

Men’s rights activists should not be fooled by this aspect of the feminist agenda. Feminists still utilize the thinking of Margaret Sanger, but directed towards men as the class of defective individuals for termination. Feminists are not stupid enough to directly call for the termination of men. We should not be so stupid as to fall for the baited feminist trap set to entice men into terminating themselves.

Supporting the feminist same-sex rights movement will continue to divide and conquer the larger men’s movement and lead it right into a feminist swamp of self-imposed inequality. Frankly speaking, men cannot secure equal marital and parental rights supporting an agenda expressly designed destroy or subvert those rights – an agenda feminists know will kill many men — leaving feminists owning the institutions of marriage and family.

That sexual preference or liberated randiness might have genetic roots is an immaterial claim. We do not promote other animalian behaviors (such as murder or rape) to protected status for good reason.

Restoring strong social rules leading to stable society is now necessary to lift America out of the socioeconomic collapse it is now suffering — a collapse palpably driven by feminist destruction of marriage and taxation of responsible individuals to the point of offshoring business, banking, and even themselves.

Indeed, work is uniformly offshored to countries with strong marriage values because they have low tax rates. Tax havens are uniformly feminist countries, such as Sweden, which are now being prised open by other feminist countries seeking cash to support the problems caused by their own feminist states. World feminism has run out of sources of cash. A return to politics based on sane marriage and social policy is inevitable at some point in the future.

I submit this to the larger men’s movement: We must oppose all feminist agenda that destroys men’s natural rights to life, marriage, and parenting — even where such opposition might be unsettling or misunderstood by gay-feminist men. We must present a united front in all regards to prevent the co-option of our movement by feminists.

We have an AIDS epidemic in America caused by feminist-gay activists practicing and proselytizing their sexual addiction. The epidemic is spreading into the heterosexual community at an alarming pace, perhaps enhanced by swinging lesbians.

The sexual liberation movement now controls the White House. We can expect a downpour of mandates coming from Washington in the coming years. States must act to protect themselves.

Matters of public health and states’ interest are paramount. States should enact health laws making homosexuality a civil offense and sending those who insist on practicing it into sexual addiction recovery programs until they get well.

The alternative is to end up with yet another victim group needing ongoing federal and state bailouts this country cannot afford, and a weak men’s movement unable to develop the winning pro-marriage, women friendly political agenda that neither party has yet been able to discover.

David R. Usher is President of the ACFC Missouri Coalition

Excellent comments follow:

Homosexuality is deviant sex, pure and simple. Without proper non biased study the truth about homosexuals and their effects on society will have to be tolerantly hidden away so as not to offend.

If I am a bigot for my position on homosexuals i must also be a bigot against all sexual deviants, rapists and child pornographers.

As a straight male hairdresser in a predominantly gay environment, I have a great affection for many of the faygeleh I work with however, i would never and i mean never leave any of them alone with a child, period. They are just to strongly motivated towards sexual deviancy.

Homosexuality is WRONG if you apply logic to all situations you will find out what in life is right and wrong if all of society was all good then human race can go on if society was bad then the human will die out so good is right bad is wrong

the same can be applied to gay and straight if all society was gay then the human race is doomed so it must be wrong

t's absolutely true that homosexuality is an evolutionary dead end. In many cases I think homosexuality is a symptomatic outcome of some trauma or event in someone's life. It could also be a program of behavior that is genetically coded, or it could be congenital, or both.. (As I understand it, incidence of homosexuality increases with stress. And since individual stress is associated with the increasing challenges of urbanization, homosexuality has increased as an overall percentage of the population.)

Whatever the explanation, I think homosexuality is nature's way of taking the person out of the gene/meme pool because something is indeed wrong.