Being gay is a sexual disorder the American Psychological Association does not recognize because it drove out Division leaders and members who recognized sexual addiction for what it is. Gay men have eight times more sexual partners than heterosexual men do, and are the prevalent reason why 3% of individuals living in Washington D.C. are infected with H.I.V – on par with AIDS crisis countries such as Kenya — and three times the threshold for declaration of an epidemic (and emergency containment policy) by the C.D.C.
In spite of the fact there is very little empirical research to see if homosexuality might be a sexual disorder, and despite convincing sexual behavior statistical community evidence that homosexuality is probably a sexual disorder (and definitely a significant public health risk), the APA pretends it is not a disorder. Welcome back to the Dark Ages of societal decline caused by politically-correct Frankfurt school knowledge censors.
Speaking frankly, I know what goes on in the gay community having been invited to a few gay parties. The real party is in the bathroom. The parade goes both ways all night with any number of people in there at one time. It’s a crack house for sex addicts.
I once got a contract doing a large stage show in Reno, Nevada because the existing show had to close. Its cast consisted of gay men, who gave each other AIDS and were too sick to work.
I know another young man in his late 20’s who was preened into the gay lifestyle by activists in high school. Many high school boys don’t know what to do with girls, and find the safety of the “gay equivalent of the Boy Scouts” an attractive proposition. He is now dying of AIDS – unable to afford treatment — and about to file for bankruptcy due to past-due medical expenses.
We know that crack, heroine, and other mood-altering addictive substances are dangerous to individuals and inflict great costs and health risks on larger society. We do not think twice about dealing with drug and alcohol addiction at face value. That is why “crack studies” and “smoker’s rights” are not taught in schools. Accordingly, drugs are illegal. We tax the daylights out of tobacco, and some cities have even made smoking illegal in many locations.
If “drug rights” promoters filed lawsuits asking the courts to mandate the establishment of “Friends of Drug Lovers” support groups in the public schools, they would be laughed out of town.
No matter how one cuts it, schools and universities promoting queerness as an attractive lifestyle may one day find themselves being sued by those who become ill after being conscripted into this dangerous lifestyle.
The shrill defiance of same-sex rights activists has gone too far. Same-sex marriage is now out of the question. As an “economic right” advocates now demand, same-sex marriage would not build chastity into open marriages.
Same-sex marriage is a viciously sexist proposition: the stated intent of feminist strategists is to secure the right for any two women to marry each other, turning marriage into a feminist political institution having chattel control of family, children, and the levers of political power. We are not far from this day. Upon creation of Obama’s White House Council on Women and Girls, N.O.W’s president (and Alpha-lesbian) Kim Gandy proudly proclaimed “We Got the Entire Cabinet”. Obama is set to inject gay lifestyle into the military, and sign a non-binding U.N. gay rights treaty that G.W. Bush refused to sign. N.O.W. does not give a damn about gay men – many of whom will die supporting N.O.W.’s feminist-supremacist agenda.
The men’s movement is presently bifurcated on gay rights. Very strong disagreement exists behind the scenes among leaders of the men’s movement.
Most colleges and universities actively sponsor “Men’s Rights” as a subset of women’s studies programs – limited to gay rights activism. A good chunk of the larger men’s rights movement has been thus compromised – men’s rights activists are often brainwashed pro-gay college graduates or have been browbeaten along with the rest of the quaking masses into believing that opposing this aspect of the feminist agenda is somehow bigoted.
This problem is dividing and conquering this movement right at the starting gate. There is a strange belief held by left-leaning men’s rights activists, who believe that supporting this aspect of the feminist agenda will somehow translate into Democrat support for other men’s rights agenda such as VAWA and parental rights reforms. This is rather like asking Hitler to make full citizens of Jews who supported the Third Reich.
Men’s rights activists should not be fooled by this aspect of the feminist agenda. Feminists still utilize the thinking of Margaret Sanger, but directed towards men as the class of defective individuals for termination. Feminists are not stupid enough to directly call for the termination of men. We should not be so stupid as to fall for the baited feminist trap set to entice men into terminating themselves.
Supporting the feminist same-sex rights movement will continue to divide and conquer the larger men’s movement and lead it right into a feminist swamp of self-imposed inequality. Frankly speaking, men cannot secure equal marital and parental rights supporting an agenda expressly designed destroy or subvert those rights – an agenda feminists know will kill many men — leaving feminists owning the institutions of marriage and family.
That sexual preference or liberated randiness might have genetic roots is an immaterial claim. We do not promote other animalian behaviors (such as murder or rape) to protected status for good reason.
Restoring strong social rules leading to stable society is now necessary to lift America out of the socioeconomic collapse it is now suffering — a collapse palpably driven by feminist destruction of marriage and taxation of responsible individuals to the point of offshoring business, banking, and even themselves.
Indeed, work is uniformly offshored to countries with strong marriage values because they have low tax rates. Tax havens are uniformly feminist countries, such as Sweden, which are now being prised open by other feminist countries seeking cash to support the problems caused by their own feminist states. World feminism has run out of sources of cash. A return to politics based on sane marriage and social policy is inevitable at some point in the future.
I submit this to the larger men’s movement: We must oppose all feminist agenda that destroys men’s natural rights to life, marriage, and parenting — even where such opposition might be unsettling or misunderstood by gay-feminist men. We must present a united front in all regards to prevent the co-option of our movement by feminists.
We have an AIDS epidemic in America caused by feminist-gay activists practicing and proselytizing their sexual addiction. The epidemic is spreading into the heterosexual community at an alarming pace, perhaps enhanced by swinging lesbians.
The sexual liberation movement now controls the White House. We can expect a downpour of mandates coming from Washington in the coming years. States must act to protect themselves.
Matters of public health and states’ interest are paramount. States should enact health laws making homosexuality a civil offense and sending those who insist on practicing it into sexual addiction recovery programs until they get well.
The alternative is to end up with yet another victim group needing ongoing federal and state bailouts this country cannot afford, and a weak men’s movement unable to develop the winning pro-marriage, women friendly political agenda that neither party has yet been able to discover.
David R. Usher is President of the ACFC Missouri Coalition
Excellent comments follow:
Homosexuality is deviant sex, pure and simple. Without proper non biased study the truth about homosexuals and their effects on society will have to be tolerantly hidden away so as not to offend.
If I am a bigot for my position on homosexuals i must also be a bigot against all sexual deviants, rapists and child pornographers.
As a straight male hairdresser in a predominantly gay environment, I have a great affection for many of the faygeleh I work with however, i would never and i mean never leave any of them alone with a child, period. They are just to strongly motivated towards sexual deviancy.
Homosexuality is WRONG if you apply logic to all situations you will find out what in life is right and wrong if all of society was all good then human race can go on if society was bad then the human will die out so good is right bad is wrong
the same can be applied to gay and straight if all society was gay then the human race is doomed so it must be wrong
t's absolutely true that homosexuality is an evolutionary dead end. In many cases I think homosexuality is a symptomatic outcome of some trauma or event in someone's life. It could also be a program of behavior that is genetically coded, or it could be congenital, or both.. (As I understand it, incidence of homosexuality increases with stress. And since individual stress is associated with the increasing challenges of urbanization, homosexuality has increased as an overall percentage of the population.)
Whatever the explanation, I think homosexuality is nature's way of taking the person out of the gene/meme pool because something is indeed wrong.
No comments:
Post a Comment